Today, on the stationary bike at the Y, I was watching TV and heard the host on a talk show make several grammatical errors. These were greeted by not so much as a raised eyebrow by the other guests. It reminded me of another time, years ago, when I caught a few sound bites on MTV of an interview with Jewel, who had apparently authored a book. The interviewer read some lines from the book, one of which was something to the effect that “people dress with great casualty today.” “Didn’t you mean ‘casualness?’” he asked. “Hmmm?,” uttered Jewel, trying to appear intelligent, “No, I said ‘casualty’.”
The program then jumped to a fan who said, “How dare he criticize Jewel? She’s the artist – she can use words however she likes!”
Ah ha! I finally understood the mentality of the White House staff that permitted President George W. Bush to speak of “nucular war.” It was the same mentality that refused to tell Elvis he would kill himself if he didn’t cut out his abuse of drugs because, well, how can you tell that to the King?
So songwriters will continue to write such ungrammatical phrases as “the stars shine for you and I” because, well, they’re the artists. And it’s OK if the President of the United States spoke of a “nucular” threat; it gave us grammarians something to snicker about. In the words of Mel Brooks, “It’s good to be the King!”
- Posted in: Grammar/Spelling/Punctuation
- Tagged: creative words, Dumb & Dumber, funny, George W. Bush, humor, Jewel
Songwriters I’ll cut a little slack for, since they have to deal with metre, although I’ve never quite forgiven McCartney for, “[T]his ever-changing world in which we live in.” That one always hurts my ears.
I agree; but that bothers me less than my example. You’re right, songwriters have to be forgiven (mostly).
I too would like to be paid millions to speak like a fool….
I know some people who could give you lessons……